Peak Performance Training with
Electrodermal Biofeedback
A biofeedback program that helped US Rhythmic Gymnastics Team member
do their best by learning personal control.
Erik Peper, PhD.
Andrea B. Schmid - Shapiro, Ed. D. San Francisco State University,
San Francisco, CA
Introduction
Even though athletes report that during competition
their mental attitudes account for 80% or more of their success.
few training programs systematically train athletes to control their
mental attitudes. This protocol reports on the use of electrodermal
response (EDR) biofeedback strategies to enhance peak performance.
The biofeedback strategies are derived from our two year Mental
Peak Performance Research and Training Program with United States
Rhythmic Gymnastics Team (USRGT). These strategies, however, can
be applied to any performer such as a figure skater. gymnast, sharp
shooter. dancer or musician.
In our multidisciplinary training program, we discovered
that biofeedback was a powerful tool to enhance peak performance.
Biofeedback uses instrumentation to monitor and feedback the physiological
changes that continuously occur within an individual.
The feedback can be perceived as "a psychophysiological
mirror However. the coach. teacher and researcher often are constrained
by expensive, sophisticated, electronic. laboratory devices. Recent
advances have made biofeedback equipment economical and easy to
use by the athletes on the gym floor or in the locker room; a number
of Such feedback devices have only an ON/OFF switch and cost less
than one hundred dollars.(2)
Biofeedback training can facilitate elucidating
the importance of mental training as well as monitor and encourage
the teaming of psycho-physiological control that is necessary in
peak perform~ Although we used many different biofeedback devices
in our study electromyographic, thermal and electrodermal - this
protocol focuses on the electrodermal response (EDR) biofeedback
device (one of the most economic). The EDR feedback unit
measures and feeds back changes in skin conductance. Skin conductance
measures the changes in sympathetic arousal as produced in the perspiration
of the palmar surface of the hand and correlates highly with the
triggering of the fight/flight response. This is often called Galvanic
Skin Response (GSR). Usually. changes in skin conductance can vary
with the changes in arousal. Namely. an increase in autonomic arousal
usually results in an increase in the skin conductivity. The feedback
device reflects those changes: specifically. when the conductivity
increases the pitch of the feedback sound increases, when the conductivity
decreases the pitch of the sound decreases.(3)
Although EDR is a useful feedback tool with most
a athletes some do not respond with this system. They may respond
cardiovasculaly, gastrointestinally or muscularly.
We used EDR biofeedback in peak performance training for the following
strategies:(4)
1. To illustrate how thoughts affect body and performance.
2. To monitor physiological relaxation.
3. To identify stressful components of the athletic
performance during imagery rehearsal.
4. To facilitate concentration training.
1. Thoughts affect body.
One of the major points of our mental peak
performance training program was that thoughts and feelings affect
performance., namely. each thought has a corresponding physiological
effect. In fact. performance can be highly affected by the self-talk
of the athlete. Many athletes were unaware of the extent by which
thoughts affect their physiology and performance. Yet, this concept
is the foundation of many mental training programs, which focus
on selftalk changes. Consequently. during the first phase of our
two year program, we used a small portable EDR feedback device to
illustrate this concept. In the group meeting with the 17 athletes,
one of the athletes was attached to the portable EDR feedback device.
The device was turned on and the feedback level was set so that
the sound was audible. The athlete was asked to think of an anxiety-provoking
event or we whispered something such as: "You just blew your
routine." Each time the person thought of an embarrassing event
or anxiety-provoking situation such as imagining a difficult move.
the pitch of the sound increased. Each athlete used an EDR feedback
device to experience how their thoughts and feelings affected their
physiological state. It helped them to identify and stop disturbing
thoughts and feelings as well as restructure their self-talk from
negative to positive.
2. Monitoring physiological relaxation.
Learning relaxation is important since it can allow
athletes.
1. To modulate their level of arousal necessary
for
performance;
2. To reduce the misdirected muscular efforts (differential
relaxation while doing a task; reduction of dysponesis);
3. To facilitate the skill to regenerate or fall
asleep with ease when one is under stress;
4. To build the foundation that is needed to practice
imagery rehearsal.
Acquiring the ability to regenerate or relax at
will, can be monitored with EDR feedback which allows the athletes
to monitor their changes in sympathetic arousal. As the athlete
relaxes more and more, the skin conductance level decreases.
To observe the efficacy of our relaxation training,
we monitored electromyographic, temperature and EDR while the gymnasts
practiced a rapid relaxation strategy known as autogenic training.
As the athletes rapidly relaxed. the skin conductance. as measured
from the non-dominant palmar surface, decreased as is shown in Fig.
1.
Figure 1. With the rhythmic gymnasts, the
relaxation was physiologically observed as demonstrated by an increase
in the peripheral hand temperature and a decrease in the Skin Conductance
Level (SCL).
The decrease in skin conductance demonstrates that
the athletes have learned to relax. Having the athletes practice
relaxation with a small portable EDR biofeedback device in their
rooms enhanced the relaxation. The physiological feedback is a powerful
reinforcer to facilitate learning - it continuously tells athletes
how well they are doing. With this tool. learning becomes a joyful
exploration.
3. Facilitate mental imagery rehearsal.
Imagery rehearsal of the athletic event is another
powerful tool to enhance performance in which we found EDR feedback
helpful. The athletes use small portable EDR feedback units while
they mentally rehearse their routine. These small feedback units
fit in the palm of the hand and the athlete receives the auditory
feedback as is shown in Fig 2.
Figure 2. United States Rhythmic Gymnastic practicing
imagery rehearsal of her routine with the EDR feedback device (GSRII).
With the help of EDR feedback. the athletes can,
more rapidly, identify stressful. anxiety-provoking events or cues
during imagery rehearsal of their routine. It is our premise that
if athletes are anxious about components of their routine, then,
this worry or anticipation can impede the attainment of their personal
best.
After relaxing (the athletes observe the success
by hearing the EDR feedback), the athletes mentally rehearse their
gymnastic routine. Each time. the feedback tone increases, the athletes
know they have emotionally reacted. The tone usually follows, two
seconds after the cognitive trigger, which they can then identify.
After the athletes identify the component associated
with the increase of arousal they continue to rehearse the routine
until no more electrodermal responses occur. During their imagery
rehearsal, they perceive themselves performing the routine perfectly
without experiencing any anxiety. This process is a self-paced psychophysiological
desensitization that may break the cycle in which the anxiety of
performance increases the probability of mistakes during competition.
In our study with the USRGT, each gymnast practiced
for two weeks with a small personal EDR feedback device at the Olympic
Training Center, Colorado Springs.
During the final assessment, most reported that EDR was helpful
in learning to reduce their arousal during mental rehearsal. In
fact, within two weeks, many of the gymnasts reported that they
had teamed to inhibit the EDR feedback lone during imagery rehearsal
as is illustrated in Fig 3.
Figure 3. Ratings by the USRGT of their
ability to control the EDR feedback signal while visualizing their
routines. A process, which most of them indicated to be beneficial
because it enhanced concentration and reduced arousal while visualizing.
4. Enhancing concentration training
The ability to concentrate and not be distracted
by external and internal stimuli is of primary importance during
competition. EDR feedback can be used to facilitate this concentration
learning in a "fun" dyadic practice. In this practice,
athletes formed pairs. A member of each pair mentally practiced
their competitive routine while receiving EDR feedback, simultaneously,
the other partner attempted to distract and amuse him/her so there
would be a change in die EDR feedback signal.
The partner attempted to distract him so there would
be a change in the EDR feedback signal.
After five minutes of practice, they reversed roles.
The athletes seemed to enjoy this competitive practice. while at
the same time, they learned the awareness of their own internal
cures of anxiety as well as the strategies to control their electrodermal
response through passive attention. Through this competitive practice.
the partner who received the EDR feedback learned concentration
and attentional skills, such as the ability to detach and to dissociate
from external and internal stimuli while focusing on the task.
For more strategies see the article by Schmid &
Paper, 19986.
Conclusion
To encourage athletes to maximize their potential
in competition. they need to be trained both in performance of their
physical skills and in their mental attitude. The EDR feedback strategies
presented in this protocol are powerful teaching tools to any performer.
to facilitate the mental training components, which so often affect
a performance outcome. With the use of the small portable EDR feedback
devices. a coach who wants to enhance the mental training of athletes
can also implement the above-cited strategies. Once these skills
are learned, they increase the possibility of achieving one's personal
best by generating the sense of INNER CONFIDENCE through the experience
that "I HAVE CONTROL."
Notes
1. Adapted from Peper, E. and Schmid (1983184)
The Use of Electrodermal Biofeedback for Peak Performance Training.
Somatics IV (3), 16-18.
2. We thank Thought Technology Ltd. for their.
generous donation of the electrodermal response feedback devices,
the GSRII, for use with the United States Rhythmic Gymnastics
Team. For further information contact: Thought Technology Ltd.,
2180 Belgrave Aye., Montreal, P.Q. H4A 2L8. 514-489-8251
Website: http://www.thoughttechnology.com
3. An anxious thought or feeling which trigger&
a sympathetic response is usually followed by an electrodermal
response. The latency of the response is about two seconds.
4. Peper, E. and Williams. E.A. From the Inside
Out.. A Self-Teaching and Laboratory Manual for Biofeedback. New
York: Plenum, 1981.
5. Peper, E. Ancoli. S. and Quinn. Mind~ Integration:
Essential Readings in Biofeedback. New York.. Plenum.
1979.
6. Schmid, A. & Peper, E. (1998). Strategies
for Training Concentration. In Williams, J.M. (ed) Applied
Sport Psychology. Mountain View: Mayfield Publishing Co., 316-328
Return to Article Index
|